royus77
07-13 05:22 PM
To my observation they never released the bulletin on Friday. They kept us waiting until Monday. So, relax, njoy weekend and check back on Monday.
Looks like this is your first post and how many Visa bulletiens you followed ?
Looks like this is your first post and how many Visa bulletiens you followed ?
wallpaper Justin+ieber+aby+album+
UKannan
03-18 12:07 PM
If you put the Title "The Sad Story of H1 transfer", people will think that your H1 got rejected....
Also what's wrong for following the rules for getting your H1s extension/transfer?
Also what's wrong for following the rules for getting your H1s extension/transfer?
JunRN
12-18 03:11 PM
As per AC21 rule, it is from Receipt. However, let's put some practicality into the matter. Some IO's interpret the rule wrongly and used Notice Date instead. So what will happen? Your GC denied for wrong reasons and you file for MTR because it was USCIS mistake. If you're willing to take the chance, then go. If not, better use Notice Date for practicality purposes and to avoid all the hassle of MTR, etc.
2011 Video: Justin Bieber – #39;Baby#39;
amitjoey
05-21 06:47 PM
My i 140 is denied on A2P issues.Ive filed MTR.Any one knows how long it takes to hear back from them on MTR.anf if MTR gets denied can i file new 140 using same old labour ?some one help please >>>
I got my I140 approved just today!!. It was pending since Oct 2006. And then they denied it in March 2008. After filing MTR it took a month to get it approved.
I got my I140 approved just today!!. It was pending since Oct 2006. And then they denied it in March 2008. After filing MTR it took a month to get it approved.
more...
vnsriv
03-03 03:05 PM
no its not.
Thanks
Thanks
deafTunes123
08-27 03:25 PM
Well Said.
Seems nothing is believable unless you see the GC in mail box;).
Seems nothing is believable unless you see the GC in mail box;).
more...
validIV
03-18 10:25 AM
He will have the H1 status until the expiry date. But only thing he may not be able to transfer H1 if there is no other case is pending.
Youre allowed to stay in H1 status for 6 years. If you want to extend it over 6 years, that extension will be based on the EB petition (you need an LC and approved I-140). If that EB petition is denied and denied again thru appeals (MTRs), you are out of status.
Please read: http://www.immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5293
Please consult your immigration attorney and do not rely on information posted here, that is your best chance at being assured.
Youre allowed to stay in H1 status for 6 years. If you want to extend it over 6 years, that extension will be based on the EB petition (you need an LC and approved I-140). If that EB petition is denied and denied again thru appeals (MTRs), you are out of status.
Please read: http://www.immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5293
Please consult your immigration attorney and do not rely on information posted here, that is your best chance at being assured.
2010 Screen shot of Justin Bieber
qplearn
10-25 07:56 PM
The bulletin is 2 years old (if that is considered old, given the GC standards). However, no new bulletins have followed to void it. Unless I have been advising with the wrong lawyer and wrong GC applicants (many), there is no such thing as I-485 Approval before the name check is completed. Any third party would like to comment?
Of course, they will not "approve" your 485 before your name check is cleared. You misunderstood me or I was not clear. What I meant is this: if your name check is not cleared but all other work on 485 is finished (which I think I equated to clearing the 485 in my previous post; sorry), they will tell you on phone (if you inquire) that your 485-related stuff is complete, but we are waiting for the name check. (Also, they will wait for your PD to become current).
My main point in the original post was that if it takes them 2 yrs to check your name --- the name-checking process runs concurrently with the 485 process --- then the 485 is bound to be complete by the time your name check is cleared. The processing times of 485 can be gauged from the VSC (or relevant center's) bulletins. Those proc. times do NOT indicate the processing times for the name check. If the name check happens before the 485 process is cleared, great! If not, you wait for the name check; lots (and believe me tens of thousands) of people belong to the second group. Since this forum mostly has people stuck in the process at earlier stages, you are not going to find too many people with that kind of experience here.
So your respected lawyer is technically correct, but what he/she is saying can be very badly misleading!! One gets the impression that clearing the name check happens automatically with completing work on the 485 by USCIS.
Wait a minute; I thought the name check is part of the I485 approval (and for those who file I-140 and I-485 concurrently, part of the I-140 approval).
And the name check is certainly not a part of the 140 approval even if the 140 and 485 are submitted concurrently. If any lawyer is telling you this, please change him/her.
I hope what I said above makes sense :) Took me a long time to compose that ...:)
Of course, they will not "approve" your 485 before your name check is cleared. You misunderstood me or I was not clear. What I meant is this: if your name check is not cleared but all other work on 485 is finished (which I think I equated to clearing the 485 in my previous post; sorry), they will tell you on phone (if you inquire) that your 485-related stuff is complete, but we are waiting for the name check. (Also, they will wait for your PD to become current).
My main point in the original post was that if it takes them 2 yrs to check your name --- the name-checking process runs concurrently with the 485 process --- then the 485 is bound to be complete by the time your name check is cleared. The processing times of 485 can be gauged from the VSC (or relevant center's) bulletins. Those proc. times do NOT indicate the processing times for the name check. If the name check happens before the 485 process is cleared, great! If not, you wait for the name check; lots (and believe me tens of thousands) of people belong to the second group. Since this forum mostly has people stuck in the process at earlier stages, you are not going to find too many people with that kind of experience here.
So your respected lawyer is technically correct, but what he/she is saying can be very badly misleading!! One gets the impression that clearing the name check happens automatically with completing work on the 485 by USCIS.
Wait a minute; I thought the name check is part of the I485 approval (and for those who file I-140 and I-485 concurrently, part of the I-140 approval).
And the name check is certainly not a part of the 140 approval even if the 140 and 485 are submitted concurrently. If any lawyer is telling you this, please change him/her.
I hope what I said above makes sense :) Took me a long time to compose that ...:)
more...
GCwaitforever
04-03 10:04 AM
24.�Moonlighting� Under EADs
AILA requests clarification on whether an H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrant present in the United States under a valid petition and who moonlights pursuant to an EAD still maintains his H-1B or L-1 status. It is AILA�s belief that an H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrant who maintains employment with his or her petitioner and �moonlights� with a different employer on the basis of an approved EAD continues to maintain his or her underlying nonimmigrant status. Please see the attached Addendum III for AILA�s arguments in support of this position.
Response: We appreciate your request and will take this matter under advisement.
ADDENDUM III �Moonlighting� Under EADs
For many years there has been uncertainty concerning maintenance of status by H-1B and L-1 nonimmigrants with pending applications for adjustment of status who �moonlight� pursuant to an EAD. Some of the confusion in this area is due in part a legacy INS memorandum issued in 1997 in which the Service stated that �after receiving the EAD, the alien may work for any employer desired and is not subject to E, H, or L restrictions. However, such an alien would lose his or her E-1, E-2, H-1B, or L-1 nonimmigrant status by working in open-market employment.�21
AILA believes the language emphasized above merely signals that one would lose his underlying nonimmigrant status by changing employers, rather than by adding one. It is AILA�s belief that an alien who adds an employer does not lose his underlying nonimmigrant status merely by working pursuant to an EAD, which is authorized employment under 8 C.F.R. � 274a.12(c)(9) and INA � 245(c)(8).
The 1997 legacy INS memorandum was issued before the rules were changed in 1999 to permit H-1B and L-1 nonimmigrants to be admitted to the United States pursuant to a nonimmigrant visa or advance parole, and to be employed either pursuant to an approved EAD, or a valid nonimmigrant petition approval.
In guidance issued by legacy INS after the 1999 rule change, the Service stated the following:
However, an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant will violate his/her nonimmigrant status is s/he uses the EAD to leave the employer listed on the approved I-129 petition and engage in employment for a separate employer.22 (Emphasis in original).
AILA believes that a nonimmigrant who �moonlights� pursuant to an EAD has not �left� his or her employer, and thus is still maintaining proper status. AILA requests USCIS to confirm that, in the case of an H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrant, present in the United States under a valid petition in either classification, who moonlights pursuant to an EAD, still maintains his H-1B or L-1 status.
AILA requests clarification on whether an H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrant present in the United States under a valid petition and who moonlights pursuant to an EAD still maintains his H-1B or L-1 status. It is AILA�s belief that an H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrant who maintains employment with his or her petitioner and �moonlights� with a different employer on the basis of an approved EAD continues to maintain his or her underlying nonimmigrant status. Please see the attached Addendum III for AILA�s arguments in support of this position.
Response: We appreciate your request and will take this matter under advisement.
ADDENDUM III �Moonlighting� Under EADs
For many years there has been uncertainty concerning maintenance of status by H-1B and L-1 nonimmigrants with pending applications for adjustment of status who �moonlight� pursuant to an EAD. Some of the confusion in this area is due in part a legacy INS memorandum issued in 1997 in which the Service stated that �after receiving the EAD, the alien may work for any employer desired and is not subject to E, H, or L restrictions. However, such an alien would lose his or her E-1, E-2, H-1B, or L-1 nonimmigrant status by working in open-market employment.�21
AILA believes the language emphasized above merely signals that one would lose his underlying nonimmigrant status by changing employers, rather than by adding one. It is AILA�s belief that an alien who adds an employer does not lose his underlying nonimmigrant status merely by working pursuant to an EAD, which is authorized employment under 8 C.F.R. � 274a.12(c)(9) and INA � 245(c)(8).
The 1997 legacy INS memorandum was issued before the rules were changed in 1999 to permit H-1B and L-1 nonimmigrants to be admitted to the United States pursuant to a nonimmigrant visa or advance parole, and to be employed either pursuant to an approved EAD, or a valid nonimmigrant petition approval.
In guidance issued by legacy INS after the 1999 rule change, the Service stated the following:
However, an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant will violate his/her nonimmigrant status is s/he uses the EAD to leave the employer listed on the approved I-129 petition and engage in employment for a separate employer.22 (Emphasis in original).
AILA believes that a nonimmigrant who �moonlights� pursuant to an EAD has not �left� his or her employer, and thus is still maintaining proper status. AILA requests USCIS to confirm that, in the case of an H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrant, present in the United States under a valid petition in either classification, who moonlights pursuant to an EAD, still maintains his H-1B or L-1 status.
hair ringtones Justin
WeldonSprings
05-28 12:55 PM
Is your application pending at TSC or NSC?
e-filed on 19th April and got the confirmation receipt by post on 23nd April. After that no updates. Anyone facing this issue?
e-filed on 19th April and got the confirmation receipt by post on 23nd April. After that no updates. Anyone facing this issue?
more...
lazycis
12-15 09:33 PM
Legalese was never my strong point. Which part says that EB-1 unused must go to EB-2 of same category, and then to EB-3?
(2) Aliens who are members of the professions holding advanced degrees or aliens of exceptional ability
(A) In general
Visas shall be made available, in a number not to exceed 28.6 percent of such worldwide level, plus any visas not required for the classes specified in paragraph (1),...
(3) Skilled workers, professionals, and other workers
(A) In general
Visas shall be made available, in a number not to exceed 28.6 percent of such worldwide level, plus any visas not required for the classes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2), to the following classes of aliens who are not described in paragraph (2):
(2) Aliens who are members of the professions holding advanced degrees or aliens of exceptional ability
(A) In general
Visas shall be made available, in a number not to exceed 28.6 percent of such worldwide level, plus any visas not required for the classes specified in paragraph (1),...
(3) Skilled workers, professionals, and other workers
(A) In general
Visas shall be made available, in a number not to exceed 28.6 percent of such worldwide level, plus any visas not required for the classes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2), to the following classes of aliens who are not described in paragraph (2):
hot Justin Bieber Performing
rk07
09-28 10:27 AM
All,
I just want to share some goods news from side.
All my checks got cashed today. I applied on July 23rd at NSC and got the receipt #'s from CSC starting with WAC.
I hope who ever is waiting for RN's they will get soon.
Thanks,
-rk.
I just want to share some goods news from side.
All my checks got cashed today. I applied on July 23rd at NSC and got the receipt #'s from CSC starting with WAC.
I hope who ever is waiting for RN's they will get soon.
Thanks,
-rk.
more...
house Justin Bieber baby
Canadianindian
02-10 06:39 PM
I have a question regarding use of EAD and living in Canada
My scenario
Currrently, I work on H1-B and am living in Canada (I cross US-Canada border everyday)
I am also a Canadian Citizen and used that to cross border everyday. So, far I never used the EAD
I recently got laid off, and planing on using my EAD for my next employment.
Questions
Once I start using the EAD, can I still live in Canada and work in US.
Is it necessary to live in US if one starts using EAD?
My scenario
Currrently, I work on H1-B and am living in Canada (I cross US-Canada border everyday)
I am also a Canadian Citizen and used that to cross border everyday. So, far I never used the EAD
I recently got laid off, and planing on using my EAD for my next employment.
Questions
Once I start using the EAD, can I still live in Canada and work in US.
Is it necessary to live in US if one starts using EAD?
tattoo justin bieber - aby
dpp
08-14 02:22 PM
Check below responses.
Using AP for travel is losing H1B Status?
Nope. You can continue to work on H1 eventhough you use AP for re-entry.
Also dependent GC applicant using EAD means losing primary applicant H1B Status?
Nope. Dependant usage of EAD is no way related to primary applicant. Each 485/EAD/AP is a separate application. But if primary uses EAD for work, then dependant loses H4 status and both comes to AOS pending status.
Please let me know?
Thanks
Using AP for travel is losing H1B Status?
Nope. You can continue to work on H1 eventhough you use AP for re-entry.
Also dependent GC applicant using EAD means losing primary applicant H1B Status?
Nope. Dependant usage of EAD is no way related to primary applicant. Each 485/EAD/AP is a separate application. But if primary uses EAD for work, then dependant loses H4 status and both comes to AOS pending status.
Please let me know?
Thanks
more...
pictures JustinBieber-Baby1.mp4 video
Alabaman
12-10 11:42 AM
So why do you care? Do you intend to stay past your 'visa' expiration day in the first place? Good to know though.
The question though is do they use the actual visa expiration date or your status expiration date? Considering the fact that you can have a visa valid for 2 years but still be in status longer than that period.
The question though is do they use the actual visa expiration date or your status expiration date? Considering the fact that you can have a visa valid for 2 years but still be in status longer than that period.
dresses Selena Gomez met Justin Bieber
njsucks
08-07 03:15 PM
how about live in Canada and work remotely for an american company? Is thata possible? but have to report to the company once one or two month though.
more...
makeup Perfect jb justin bieber baby
gc28262
12-10 03:02 PM
The idea here could be to give tough time for people who do not have valid visas. If they cannot get drivers license because they are on expired visa they cannot drive.
Illegals will anyway figure out a way to drive. They may even drive without a drivers license.
We are the ones who have to bear the brunt of all these illogical rules.
Can't we do anything about this ?
I read somewhere in IV that employers can't even ask for the type of work authorization when giving a job.
How come DMVs can ask our immigration status for drivers license ?
There may be scope for some action here.
Illegals will anyway figure out a way to drive. They may even drive without a drivers license.
We are the ones who have to bear the brunt of all these illogical rules.
Can't we do anything about this ?
I read somewhere in IV that employers can't even ask for the type of work authorization when giving a job.
How come DMVs can ask our immigration status for drivers license ?
There may be scope for some action here.
girlfriend justin bieber baby. justin
optimist
06-18 10:29 AM
The evidence of experience should include Job Responsibilities(detailed), Salary, Dates and peferably on company letterhead (or at least should have full contact information of person writing the letters, to prove authenticity). If the papers you already provided (affidavits from co-workers, previous co. offer letter, yearly appraisal letters and last few pay stubs) have all this info, they should be enough to prove your experience.
Are you sure your 'company lawyer' is handling this case well? There are innumerable horror stories of company "lawyers" messing up a perfectly good case and 'forgetting' to submit all documents with the petition. Please get all the papers from your company lawyer and consult with your own attorney to discuss the case ASAP - it will be really worth paying for this consultation.
Good Luck!
Are you sure your 'company lawyer' is handling this case well? There are innumerable horror stories of company "lawyers" messing up a perfectly good case and 'forgetting' to submit all documents with the petition. Please get all the papers from your company lawyer and consult with your own attorney to discuss the case ASAP - it will be really worth paying for this consultation.
Good Luck!
hairstyles Justin Bieber - Baby [6-8
rajmalhotra
10-09 04:18 PM
We entered US in May 2007. My wife's visa stamp was expiring in Nov., but her H4 Visa was expiring in April 2008.
The Customs officer put date valid till Nov. 2007.
I went to US Customs and border protection office and showed them the original Visa. They asked to fill up new I-94 and stamped it with April 2008 Date.
Here's the link: http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/id_visa/i-94_instructions/arrival_departure_record.xml
---------------------------
Q: How do I correct an Arrival-Departure Record reflecting an incorrect admission classification, biographical information or period of admission?
A: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will review and issue the necessary documents to remedy errors recorded on the Arrival-Departure Record at the time of entry to the United States relating to improper non-immigrant classification, inaccurate biographical information or incorrect period of admission, if appropriate.
Any designated deferred inspection location or CBP office located within an international airport should be able to assist you, regardless of where the actual document was issued. In many instances, the location of your final destination where the discrepancy will be resolved may not be the port of your first arrival into the United States. Travelers are encouraged to contact sites not located within an international airport to establish an appointment, if necessary. Mail-in procedures are not available.
Currently, there is not an approved form to request the correction of inaccurate information recorded on the I-94 or I-95 Form at the time of entry into the United States. You will need to bring the questionable I-94 or I-95 Form and documentation to support the claim that the form was not properly annotated. For example, present a passport and visa to justify an incorrect visa classification or an approved petition to support an incorrect admission period. A fee will not be assessed.
The CBP offices within the international airports and deferred inspection locations are only authorized to correct errors that occurred at the time of arrival. Requests to replace the I-94 or I-95 Form that has been lost, stolen or mutilated must be filed with USCIS.
Authorized stays that were limited at the port of first arrival by supervisory authorization as noted on the reverse side of the I-94 Form will not be corrected. Under these circumstances, you will be required to file an I-539 Form with USCIS. .
---------------------
The Customs officer put date valid till Nov. 2007.
I went to US Customs and border protection office and showed them the original Visa. They asked to fill up new I-94 and stamped it with April 2008 Date.
Here's the link: http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/id_visa/i-94_instructions/arrival_departure_record.xml
---------------------------
Q: How do I correct an Arrival-Departure Record reflecting an incorrect admission classification, biographical information or period of admission?
A: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will review and issue the necessary documents to remedy errors recorded on the Arrival-Departure Record at the time of entry to the United States relating to improper non-immigrant classification, inaccurate biographical information or incorrect period of admission, if appropriate.
Any designated deferred inspection location or CBP office located within an international airport should be able to assist you, regardless of where the actual document was issued. In many instances, the location of your final destination where the discrepancy will be resolved may not be the port of your first arrival into the United States. Travelers are encouraged to contact sites not located within an international airport to establish an appointment, if necessary. Mail-in procedures are not available.
Currently, there is not an approved form to request the correction of inaccurate information recorded on the I-94 or I-95 Form at the time of entry into the United States. You will need to bring the questionable I-94 or I-95 Form and documentation to support the claim that the form was not properly annotated. For example, present a passport and visa to justify an incorrect visa classification or an approved petition to support an incorrect admission period. A fee will not be assessed.
The CBP offices within the international airports and deferred inspection locations are only authorized to correct errors that occurred at the time of arrival. Requests to replace the I-94 or I-95 Form that has been lost, stolen or mutilated must be filed with USCIS.
Authorized stays that were limited at the port of first arrival by supervisory authorization as noted on the reverse side of the I-94 Form will not be corrected. Under these circumstances, you will be required to file an I-539 Form with USCIS. .
---------------------
willigetgc?
02-25 01:10 PM
With that said, let me be a devils-advocate, if you will, and ask these questions:
Given ours is a issue-based, goal-based struggle, with Goal & Issue being same for ALL EB immigrants:
--- Why should I expect all immigrants to wear any organization's badge, be dedicated to any particular/one organization, whether that Org is IV/Democrats/Republicans/Congress/BJP
--- Shouldn't I be just worried about who can SHOUT louder about my issue and less worried about the Organization that's making them SHOUT?
-----
Thanks for the discussion again.
Hypothetically speaking, let's assume all the 55,000 members in IV are active but are not organized under one umbrella (IV). Each of them have the same problem (stuck in the backlogs) and each of them approach lawmakers. Each discusses their own personal case and each of them discuss about a solution that fits them - (human nature). Some of them may be the very same provisions as IV. But will these 55,000 people mention all the provisions? chances are - No.
So, there will be no coherent messaging, even though there are 55,000 people participating simultaneously.
Second, without being an organized unit, we loose the collective strength. Say a lawmaker is interested in fixing our problems - his task will be tremendous - he probably has only 10 people who have approached his office to fix the problem - so not only does he have to find out if there is a wide range of people affected by this problem, he also has to contact each of the 10 people individually. Guess what? he too will suggest for the 10 people to join forces and be under one umbrella.
What I am trying to say is that IV has already brought us together. It has built good relations with key people in DC. It has done the ground work. Why not build on the sound foundation?
In life we are ready to be grouped as Indians, Indian-Americans, Asians, Male, Female, Married, Unmarried, Hindu, Christian, Muslim, political organizations (we believe in one or the other - independents, democrats, republicans, congress, bjp), Unions, Employees of Cisco, IBM, Desi Consulting - what is wrong in identifying oneself in a group if you believe in it? By nature we are a collective group, but we think that it is wrong/unnecessary to belong to a group! We think we are smarter for being independent. But the truth is that even the most independent of the guys lives in a society. He may not accept it, but that does not change the facts.
Bottom line is, what each one of us believe in. If we believe in a cause, we will find a way to work on it. Quantity matters only when there is quality. If we have to depend on only one, my preference would be on quality. I want the loudest person, but at the same time, I want that loud person to be shouting the message that I want - or else it defeats the purpose.
Leo, this is just my opinion, not IV's - though I would think IV will agree with me. I believe in collective strength and individual's logic to think matters through (no brainwashing!).
I have nothing more to say.
Given ours is a issue-based, goal-based struggle, with Goal & Issue being same for ALL EB immigrants:
--- Why should I expect all immigrants to wear any organization's badge, be dedicated to any particular/one organization, whether that Org is IV/Democrats/Republicans/Congress/BJP
--- Shouldn't I be just worried about who can SHOUT louder about my issue and less worried about the Organization that's making them SHOUT?
-----
Thanks for the discussion again.
Hypothetically speaking, let's assume all the 55,000 members in IV are active but are not organized under one umbrella (IV). Each of them have the same problem (stuck in the backlogs) and each of them approach lawmakers. Each discusses their own personal case and each of them discuss about a solution that fits them - (human nature). Some of them may be the very same provisions as IV. But will these 55,000 people mention all the provisions? chances are - No.
So, there will be no coherent messaging, even though there are 55,000 people participating simultaneously.
Second, without being an organized unit, we loose the collective strength. Say a lawmaker is interested in fixing our problems - his task will be tremendous - he probably has only 10 people who have approached his office to fix the problem - so not only does he have to find out if there is a wide range of people affected by this problem, he also has to contact each of the 10 people individually. Guess what? he too will suggest for the 10 people to join forces and be under one umbrella.
What I am trying to say is that IV has already brought us together. It has built good relations with key people in DC. It has done the ground work. Why not build on the sound foundation?
In life we are ready to be grouped as Indians, Indian-Americans, Asians, Male, Female, Married, Unmarried, Hindu, Christian, Muslim, political organizations (we believe in one or the other - independents, democrats, republicans, congress, bjp), Unions, Employees of Cisco, IBM, Desi Consulting - what is wrong in identifying oneself in a group if you believe in it? By nature we are a collective group, but we think that it is wrong/unnecessary to belong to a group! We think we are smarter for being independent. But the truth is that even the most independent of the guys lives in a society. He may not accept it, but that does not change the facts.
Bottom line is, what each one of us believe in. If we believe in a cause, we will find a way to work on it. Quantity matters only when there is quality. If we have to depend on only one, my preference would be on quality. I want the loudest person, but at the same time, I want that loud person to be shouting the message that I want - or else it defeats the purpose.
Leo, this is just my opinion, not IV's - though I would think IV will agree with me. I believe in collective strength and individual's logic to think matters through (no brainwashing!).
I have nothing more to say.
EndlessWait
07-13 12:27 PM
Please avoid all this sensationalism in your thread headers! You don't seem to know squat and are claiming something without any reference...the red dot/square seems appropriate...why I am replying to this!?
i'm just putting my opinion in my way. that's what this forum is for. atleast not talking BS, just staying on the main topic.
btw u answered for ur urself, i'll just repeat with a change "why are you replying to this!" go see a doctor, is my advise.
i'm just putting my opinion in my way. that's what this forum is for. atleast not talking BS, just staying on the main topic.
btw u answered for ur urself, i'll just repeat with a change "why are you replying to this!" go see a doctor, is my advise.
No comments:
Post a Comment