pd_recapturing
04-23 08:23 AM
Your GC sponsor will not revoke 140
Only this part looks scary ... if u have had issues with employer and have not left him amicably, they may revoke 140 ...What can we do if employer revokes 140 ?
Only this part looks scary ... if u have had issues with employer and have not left him amicably, they may revoke 140 ...What can we do if employer revokes 140 ?
wallpaper disney princess jasmine
jthomas
11-20 05:26 PM
I don't know how to start a new thread
send your comments on
http://power.elecdesign.com/Articles/index.cfm?articleid=17564&StyleName=maroon
IEEE Agrees with SIA on H-1B Visas for Foreign Engineers, Scientists
send your comments on
http://power.elecdesign.com/Articles/index.cfm?articleid=17564&StyleName=maroon
IEEE Agrees with SIA on H-1B Visas for Foreign Engineers, Scientists
ivar
07-09 03:46 PM
We should take help from "Paul the Octopus" :)
when is Aug 2010 visa bulletin expected?
when is Aug 2010 visa bulletin expected?
2011 Disney Princess Jasmine
Jai_MD
11-20 09:11 AM
how about anyone having
A. Masters Degree+3 Yrs US Experience+Permanent Job=Apply for GC
B. Bachelors Degree + 5 Yrs US Experience+Permanent Job=Apply for GC
Get Rid of this country limit.
Intel's CEO once rightly said that,US has to become mean as to who they want in this country, A person right off the boat(Asylee,GC-Lottery etc) OR a US trained and educated individual contributing directly to the economic system.
A. Masters Degree+3 Yrs US Experience+Permanent Job=Apply for GC
B. Bachelors Degree + 5 Yrs US Experience+Permanent Job=Apply for GC
Get Rid of this country limit.
Intel's CEO once rightly said that,US has to become mean as to who they want in this country, A person right off the boat(Asylee,GC-Lottery etc) OR a US trained and educated individual contributing directly to the economic system.
more...
Hermione
10-02 04:09 PM
That's correct, employer cannot withdraw I-140 after I-485 has been pending for 180 days. Also, even if I-140 is not approved after 180 days, it can be ported to a different employer, provided that the original I-140 was approvable. Ability to pay in that case is determined based on the original company's ability to pay.
pro, 1) you must have a job offer in hand in the same or similar postion for your green card to be approved (this is why it is called employement based category) 2) AC21, which can be invoked any time after your I-485 has been pending for more than 180 days, changes the sponsoring employer on your green card. You may actually work for any employer in the meantime, provided, you have proper authorization.
pro, 1) you must have a job offer in hand in the same or similar postion for your green card to be approved (this is why it is called employement based category) 2) AC21, which can be invoked any time after your I-485 has been pending for more than 180 days, changes the sponsoring employer on your green card. You may actually work for any employer in the meantime, provided, you have proper authorization.
kunallen
01-18 10:23 PM
Hi, all,
I think my situation is a little complicated as follow: while I am still in F1 status and visa (2.5 months before graduation), one company filed I-140 petition for me on EB3(May. 2006), I applied for OPT EAD card and got it approved on Sep, 2006. Then my previous I-140 got approved on Dec. 2006. And now I am using my OPT EAD working in another company, and will start my H1B application with the current company soon.
I am wondering if the previous I-140 application with previous company affects my current H1B application with my current company? Since it was filed while I was in F1 status(even before OPT EAD approval), some said it is not allowed...
I am really concerned about this now... please advise ..
Many many thanks
Edit/Delete Message
I think my situation is a little complicated as follow: while I am still in F1 status and visa (2.5 months before graduation), one company filed I-140 petition for me on EB3(May. 2006), I applied for OPT EAD card and got it approved on Sep, 2006. Then my previous I-140 got approved on Dec. 2006. And now I am using my OPT EAD working in another company, and will start my H1B application with the current company soon.
I am wondering if the previous I-140 application with previous company affects my current H1B application with my current company? Since it was filed while I was in F1 status(even before OPT EAD approval), some said it is not allowed...
I am really concerned about this now... please advise ..
Many many thanks
Edit/Delete Message
more...
Naruto
10-05 05:14 PM
I think its more than 3 since I got a notice about my 2003 state taxes in 2007 which they said they never received and I got stuck with a penalty ( although I was getting a refund ). I paid the penalty since it would have been too much of a hassle to go through 2003 records and then duelling it out with the IRS.
if you get a refund and you refile you should not have penalty....?
if you get a refund and you refile you should not have penalty....?
2010 Princess Jasmine amp; Aladdin
psk79
10-04 10:12 AM
Mine says a notice was sent that it is approved on sep 26. mSo far nothing. I was told my attorney will get it.....
more...
truthinspector
01-07 11:40 AM
Of Satyam's reported cash and bank balances of 53.61 billion rupees on Sept. 30, 50.4 billion rupees was non-existent, Raju said in the letter sent to the Bombay Stock Exchange.
hair disney Princess+jasmine+
samrat_bhargava_vihari
02-08 10:07 PM
Why do you guys have such a hard time believing....
Law says what it says
Visa bulletin has the notce
Berkleybee isn't saying anything in that conversation with DOS which isn't already covered by the law or the note in 2005 visa bulletin.
Still; everyone is thinking it is a mistake and it is going to get current in 3 to 4months?
The cynic in me believes that everyone thinks it is just a matter of time before it becomes current or there is significant movements in dates. This is dead wrong. All one needs to do is look at data coming out from backlog processing centers; amount of 245i labors; statistics on how many people have come on h-1b; l-1's, b visas, f visas, amont of perm labor approvals; amount of greencards approved over the last five years.
It is going to be a very, very long time before there is significant movement in dates.
The cynic in me thinks Berkleybee posted it in immigration.com so that people may now get the message the dates aren't going to move. They aren't going to move significantly next year either. There is TOO many people going for greencards.
As long as people think that the dates are going to move, then they sit on the fence and don't do much to get rid of retrogression.
I am sure if people could get convinced that in current environment; visa dates will never get current then people may have some urgency in participating to get rid of retrogression.
UN,
I have strong belief on your postings. Don�t know about Berkleybee�
I am from India EB3. I strongly believe that we can change this system, after all it is human made, outdated and obviously not suitable for current scenario.
So realistically what we can do about this, if so what would be the approach.
Law says what it says
Visa bulletin has the notce
Berkleybee isn't saying anything in that conversation with DOS which isn't already covered by the law or the note in 2005 visa bulletin.
Still; everyone is thinking it is a mistake and it is going to get current in 3 to 4months?
The cynic in me believes that everyone thinks it is just a matter of time before it becomes current or there is significant movements in dates. This is dead wrong. All one needs to do is look at data coming out from backlog processing centers; amount of 245i labors; statistics on how many people have come on h-1b; l-1's, b visas, f visas, amont of perm labor approvals; amount of greencards approved over the last five years.
It is going to be a very, very long time before there is significant movement in dates.
The cynic in me thinks Berkleybee posted it in immigration.com so that people may now get the message the dates aren't going to move. They aren't going to move significantly next year either. There is TOO many people going for greencards.
As long as people think that the dates are going to move, then they sit on the fence and don't do much to get rid of retrogression.
I am sure if people could get convinced that in current environment; visa dates will never get current then people may have some urgency in participating to get rid of retrogression.
UN,
I have strong belief on your postings. Don�t know about Berkleybee�
I am from India EB3. I strongly believe that we can change this system, after all it is human made, outdated and obviously not suitable for current scenario.
So realistically what we can do about this, if so what would be the approach.
more...
gc_freedom
05-12 02:10 PM
The correct address for EAD renewals is on page 7 form.Look for the following on the link http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/usc...0045f3d6a1RCRD posted by nogc_noproblem.
check for this:-
(9) I-485 pending Please see page 7 of the form instructions for more information.
Thanks,
gc_freedom
check for this:-
(9) I-485 pending Please see page 7 of the form instructions for more information.
Thanks,
gc_freedom
hot Disney Princess - A Whole New
brb2
07-19 05:24 PM
There are over 339,000 people stuck in name check - this is done for naturalization and 485. I can bet you this will be the next battle because a lot people who have filed 485 will get stuck in this black hole, where this no accountability by FBI to individuals because the "client" is USCIS and last quarter there were 400 law suits (Writ of Madamus etc) to force USCIS and FBI to do their jobs. It would be best if setting time limits for name checks are included in IVs goals now itself. No point in jumping from the frying pan if one is going to eventually land in the fire. The name check snares a lot of Indians, Chinese, middle easterners, russians etc. Most people stuck in the name check have never been involved with the law - go figure the algorithm FBI uses to trawl the ocean bed!
Another thought i had was...Before all of us june,july,august folks land up in the blackhole of FBI namechecks...Can we lobby for some kind of transparency?What in the world can make them take 4 yrs to check a persons name?Can they at least maintain a website that they update as and when a name check is completed...Please core and members,do something about this...something as effective as the campaign to accept july applicants!!while they are overhauling the system let them get it right all the way!!
Another thought i had was...Before all of us june,july,august folks land up in the blackhole of FBI namechecks...Can we lobby for some kind of transparency?What in the world can make them take 4 yrs to check a persons name?Can they at least maintain a website that they update as and when a name check is completed...Please core and members,do something about this...something as effective as the campaign to accept july applicants!!while they are overhauling the system let them get it right all the way!!
more...
house PRINCESS JASMINE T11DYDD13
pd_recapturing
03-04 01:55 PM
Pearson memo soft copy is here (http://immigrationportal.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=16204&d=1177965983)
I sent mine and spouse's 485 receipt notices and both the I-140 approval notices. I sent only copies. You really need to find the correct PO Box number of TSC or NSC to send the documents. My attorney sent the letter to NSC general service PO Box and I do not think that it was correct. I am planning to send the same stuff again to 485 filing PO Box.
I sent mine and spouse's 485 receipt notices and both the I-140 approval notices. I sent only copies. You really need to find the correct PO Box number of TSC or NSC to send the documents. My attorney sent the letter to NSC general service PO Box and I do not think that it was correct. I am planning to send the same stuff again to 485 filing PO Box.
tattoo She got to sing Princess
sidbee
06-18 11:45 AM
This is my new employer asking me sign this document called "time sheet agreement"...would it stand in the court of law, say I left the job and could they come after me with this paper?
here is the 80% of whats in there with company called (name changed) Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company :D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If the employee wishes to terminate his/her services with Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company, he/she agrees to assist Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company in fulfilling the contract terms that Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company signed with client like notice period etc. The client peanilizes Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company if he/she leaves the project abruptly without sufficient notice. Employee is responsible for all monetary penalties the client will enforce on Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company because of his/her action.
Employee agrees not to transfer billing to another firm and / or accept payments from another firm or the primary vendor or mid vendor for the project you are currently working will be working in future. Employee agrees not to solicit directly or indirectly Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company�s client and vendors.
Employee is responsible for the accuracy of the time sheet submitted for payroll. If Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company pays you and we did not get the money from the client, he/she are responsible to reimburse Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company all the amount that is under dispute within 5 business days. Employee is responsible for all the legal and administrative costs (attorney, collections etc) for enforcing the above terms. All disputes will be settled according to the laws of the sate of NJ.
Employee agrees to reimburse Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company any and all over payments made to you within 5 business days. If you fail to do so, then the employee agrees to pay the legal costs involved in enforcing the same.
The above costs are difficult to calculate and will be based on our approximations.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is this how every company asks their employee to sign?? This is my first experience on this...never signed anything like this before.... :rolleyes:
Please let me know,
Thanks,
LIGCP :mad:
99% agreements written by the desi consultants are not legal ( they are one sided) . if you dont sign it , you dont get the job.
I am not a lawyer , and this is my personal view out of the experience on being a H1
here is the 80% of whats in there with company called (name changed) Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company :D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If the employee wishes to terminate his/her services with Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company, he/she agrees to assist Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company in fulfilling the contract terms that Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company signed with client like notice period etc. The client peanilizes Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company if he/she leaves the project abruptly without sufficient notice. Employee is responsible for all monetary penalties the client will enforce on Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company because of his/her action.
Employee agrees not to transfer billing to another firm and / or accept payments from another firm or the primary vendor or mid vendor for the project you are currently working will be working in future. Employee agrees not to solicit directly or indirectly Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company�s client and vendors.
Employee is responsible for the accuracy of the time sheet submitted for payroll. If Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company pays you and we did not get the money from the client, he/she are responsible to reimburse Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company all the amount that is under dispute within 5 business days. Employee is responsible for all the legal and administrative costs (attorney, collections etc) for enforcing the above terms. All disputes will be settled according to the laws of the sate of NJ.
Employee agrees to reimburse Nathuram-daulathram-desi-Company any and all over payments made to you within 5 business days. If you fail to do so, then the employee agrees to pay the legal costs involved in enforcing the same.
The above costs are difficult to calculate and will be based on our approximations.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is this how every company asks their employee to sign?? This is my first experience on this...never signed anything like this before.... :rolleyes:
Please let me know,
Thanks,
LIGCP :mad:
99% agreements written by the desi consultants are not legal ( they are one sided) . if you dont sign it , you dont get the job.
I am not a lawyer , and this is my personal view out of the experience on being a H1
more...
pictures princess jasmine costume kim
wandmaker
01-10 09:40 PM
All,
My employer revoked the i140 of a person after 180 days. He did not reveal this information to me and used labor substitution for me.
The other person used AC21 and got his 485 approved. INS has denied my I140 since a 485 has already been approved and there can be only one GC on one labor. INS says that once the 485 is approved that job ceases to exist.
My company is saying that they have done this in the past and got approvals. They are saying that they applied the I140 substitution long before the 485 approval of the other person.
Now they are saying that they will appeal that the other guy never had the intention of working for the comapany.
Is there any chance for the I140 approval and using the existing labor ? If not will the INS help me keep the Priority Date.
Does anyone have knowledge of such cases (or) know the results of such appeals.
Thanks !
Chances of getting your 140 appoved after appeal is less than 0.0001%; You can not keep the priority date because it is not yours to keep. You have played the game of risk vs rewards, Move on.
My employer revoked the i140 of a person after 180 days. He did not reveal this information to me and used labor substitution for me.
The other person used AC21 and got his 485 approved. INS has denied my I140 since a 485 has already been approved and there can be only one GC on one labor. INS says that once the 485 is approved that job ceases to exist.
My company is saying that they have done this in the past and got approvals. They are saying that they applied the I140 substitution long before the 485 approval of the other person.
Now they are saying that they will appeal that the other guy never had the intention of working for the comapany.
Is there any chance for the I140 approval and using the existing labor ? If not will the INS help me keep the Priority Date.
Does anyone have knowledge of such cases (or) know the results of such appeals.
Thanks !
Chances of getting your 140 appoved after appeal is less than 0.0001%; You can not keep the priority date because it is not yours to keep. You have played the game of risk vs rewards, Move on.
dresses princess jasmine
hsingh82
04-21 12:11 PM
I would support this bill since it makes a lot of sense. I am not going to benefit from this since I have masters and not PhD but people who have sacrificed the lure of big money to live on campus with 2-3 roomies for almost 5 years in which time their friends who graduated are driving lexus and staying in 5 Br homes need some consolation prize. This is a great move for these students as well as the country.
While I definitely support this bill, I fail to understand your logic here. They definitely are bright candidates but they did everything by choice for the personal and professional gain. They should be given GC because they are asset to this country not because they don't own lexus or 5 Br house which by the way tells a lot about other hardworking people who own them.
While I definitely support this bill, I fail to understand your logic here. They definitely are bright candidates but they did everything by choice for the personal and professional gain. They should be given GC because they are asset to this country not because they don't own lexus or 5 Br house which by the way tells a lot about other hardworking people who own them.
more...
makeup at Walt Disney World.
coopheal
03-24 09:56 PM
hey coopheal
do yo know what the RFE is about
thks
Not yet. Waiting for actual RFE for that.
do yo know what the RFE is about
thks
Not yet. Waiting for actual RFE for that.
girlfriend Disney Princess Jasmine
inskrish
07-20 10:19 AM
They do not need to be notarized as long as they are self-attested. Scanned copies are fine. Retain the original with you in case the CIS asks for it.
AFIK, the affidavits must be notarized.
Regards,
IK
AFIK, the affidavits must be notarized.
Regards,
IK
hairstyles disney princess jasmine.
ngopalak
06-14 06:31 PM
The retrogression is bound to happen again in a few months and it will be YEARS before we get our green card.
We need to keep the fight up in the senate. Can we have another fax campaign started right away?
We need to keep the fight up in the senate. Can we have another fax campaign started right away?
shreekhand
07-13 01:53 PM
Accepting I-485 without PD current also needs legislation...if you don't know about that already !
Good news could only be this. Accept I-485 and issue EADs. Country limit cannot be removed that quickly. I think a legislation needs to be passed to be in effect. What say??
Good news could only be this. Accept I-485 and issue EADs. Country limit cannot be removed that quickly. I think a legislation needs to be passed to be in effect. What say??
avi
01-15 05:31 PM
Did any one whose I-485 was Xfr'd from NSC->CSC->NSC receive FP notice? If so, please list your city/state where FP is scheduled and if you opened a SR for FP.
In particular, i want to track folks from bay area, CA and those who didn't open SR.
Thanks!
I called them up yesterday and i was kept on hold for around 2:15 hrs before i hung up! the music was not pleasing either! Will give it a try again sometime tomorrow!
In particular, i want to track folks from bay area, CA and those who didn't open SR.
Thanks!
I called them up yesterday and i was kept on hold for around 2:15 hrs before i hung up! the music was not pleasing either! Will give it a try again sometime tomorrow!
No comments:
Post a Comment