pakrish
02-22 11:09 AM
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070222-121742-6247r.htm
wallpaper Célula animal (ampliar imagen)
olgab90
08-30 08:21 PM
if you sent it between july 17 and august 17 there should be no problem,, uscis was accepting i 485 forms without medical exams due to the july 2nd trouble.
ivuser
02-16 04:27 PM
Murthy Law firm
Attorney : Shela Murthy
Page URL : http://www.murthy.com/485faq.html#13
Content:
Question 13 .
Can I leave my sponsoring employer once I get my green card? TOP
One may switch employers during the I-485 process if (a) the I-485 has been pending for over 180 days and is not yet adjudicated and (b) the offer of new employment is in the same or similar job. While the USCIS may use the description of the job duties from the DOT or the O*NET to determine similarity in jobs, they have verbally agreed that they may be willing to consider a broader definition in the future. Besides job title and description, the salary from the new employer would at least need to satisfy concerns regarding the public charge provisions and should be as closed to the amount listed on the labor certification as possible.
Clearly, the law before AC21 was passed in October 2000 required that a person continue working with the employer that sponsored the green card for at least 6 months to 1 year after obtaining the green card. Although AC21 allows the changing of employers if the I-485 is not adjudicated within 180 days, there is no change in the law with respect to the intention of the employer to offer and the employee to undertake "permanent," full-time work with the sponsoring employer for the job advertised. Keep in mind that a green card job offer is legally considered a future job offer. Therefore, the employee must have a good-faith intention to work for the employer after the green card is approved, and the employer must have a good-faith intention to employ the employee after the green card is approved. Even if one worked for the sponsoring employer for several years while pursuing the green card process, that would not count as future intent. Generally, 6 months to 1 year after obtaining the green card is a safe time period to change employment. Failure to stay at the sponsoring employer may result in problems at the naturalization stage!
Attorney : Shela Murthy
Page URL : http://www.murthy.com/485faq.html#13
Content:
Question 13 .
Can I leave my sponsoring employer once I get my green card? TOP
One may switch employers during the I-485 process if (a) the I-485 has been pending for over 180 days and is not yet adjudicated and (b) the offer of new employment is in the same or similar job. While the USCIS may use the description of the job duties from the DOT or the O*NET to determine similarity in jobs, they have verbally agreed that they may be willing to consider a broader definition in the future. Besides job title and description, the salary from the new employer would at least need to satisfy concerns regarding the public charge provisions and should be as closed to the amount listed on the labor certification as possible.
Clearly, the law before AC21 was passed in October 2000 required that a person continue working with the employer that sponsored the green card for at least 6 months to 1 year after obtaining the green card. Although AC21 allows the changing of employers if the I-485 is not adjudicated within 180 days, there is no change in the law with respect to the intention of the employer to offer and the employee to undertake "permanent," full-time work with the sponsoring employer for the job advertised. Keep in mind that a green card job offer is legally considered a future job offer. Therefore, the employee must have a good-faith intention to work for the employer after the green card is approved, and the employer must have a good-faith intention to employ the employee after the green card is approved. Even if one worked for the sponsoring employer for several years while pursuing the green card process, that would not count as future intent. Generally, 6 months to 1 year after obtaining the green card is a safe time period to change employment. Failure to stay at the sponsoring employer may result in problems at the naturalization stage!
2011 dresses celula vegetal e
singhsa3
07-30 03:45 PM
Most likely it is an interview, I have a colleague who has similar case. But the outcome was positive. Of course, it was not immediately but they got it within three months.
Do you think he will get his case approved on the spot after interview as dates will be current at that time?
If yes, then it is worth the tension we are having.
Do you think he will get his case approved on the spot after interview as dates will be current at that time?
If yes, then it is worth the tension we are having.
more...
nozerd
04-18 11:33 AM
Just goes to proove how totally screwed up USCIS is. They process cases with 2007 PD while ppl with 2001 PD are waiting without any response.
HV000
11-19 12:06 PM
Maybe I am missing something here but the green card for this beneficiary was started in 2005. The PD of 2000 is due to a labor-substitution. Aren't those the facts here?
I was referring to the whole inefficient, time consuming immigration process. One does not know how long folks who missed the AUG 17 date have to wait!!
I was referring to the whole inefficient, time consuming immigration process. One does not know how long folks who missed the AUG 17 date have to wait!!
more...
nixstor
09-19 03:16 PM
I see that currently there are 57 members and 195 guests currently. I understand that there might be people from anti immigration groups browsing through as well. Ignoring them,How about sending an online pop up message requesting the guest to register as a member and contribute if they want? I am just trying to tap those guys in who are a bit lazy or silent observers who are reticent and come out only on the day when they got their LC approved or something significant happens. We ill make it a point on the pop up that membership does matter and its not mandatory that they contribute.
2010 celula vegetal e animal.
InTheMoment
02-08 03:45 PM
After following release dates since the past year ...I predict it will be out either tomm (9th) or Monday (12th) ;)
more...
tnite
09-19 03:32 PM
His name is Yann ,I hosted him .
myself , chandu , siddhi, poonam and tikka had lunch with him at the Union Station and he did tell us his experiences .
Ppl on their own have to realize the importance of a movement like this .No amount of convincing by friends/relatives would make any difference.
Hats off to ppl like Yann , Swede who really understood what this rally was all about...
myself , chandu , siddhi, poonam and tikka had lunch with him at the Union Station and he did tell us his experiences .
Ppl on their own have to realize the importance of a movement like this .No amount of convincing by friends/relatives would make any difference.
Hats off to ppl like Yann , Swede who really understood what this rally was all about...
hair CELULA ANIMAL Y VEGETAL
pitha
02-14 06:58 PM
Last time around exactly the same time in 2006 CIR took off like crazy because of the tremendous backing of Senate Judiciary committee chairman Arlen Specter and Senate majority Leader Bill Frist (who actually gave a deadline for a the bill to be introduced to the senate floor, to speed it up) and president bush supporting it as well. In spite of all these it took the senate from Feb-march 2006 to around September 2006 to get it passed.
Now to the present situation, Harry Reid, the current majority leader never ever publicly spoke one good word about CIR, the present senate judiciary committee chairman, Patrick J. Leahy has not displayed even 1/100 the urgency nor the interest in CIR that Arlon Specter displayed, president Bush though still supporting CIR is a wounded president licking his wounds and has truly become a lame duck president (most unfortunately for us).
Having considered the above facts what are the chances of CIR happening? Its very painful to say that but I think very low. Even by a miracle (a very big miracle at that) if something happens it will be November or December 2007 before it passes.
As if this not painful enough there is a 60 day waiting period from the day the president signs it before it becomes a law. I think there is some confusion on this 60 day period (I am not 100% sure on this). In addition to it if I remember correctly there was a strange condition which was something like there would be a 6 month investigation period to determine the effects of CIR before becoming a law. If you add all this nonsense up I think in the best case scenario January or February 2008 before CIR becomes law and worst case scenario July or August 2008 to become a law. just my 2 cents. I can only pray and hope I am wrong.
Bills almost never go to the floor directly. Especially something as huge as CIR. It will go thru committee again and it will go thru normal rounds of debate and amendments between the 18 people in Judiciary committee.
Its very unusual for a bill to hit the floor directly without going thru the committee that has jurisdiction over it. If it happens all the time, then the committees would be meaningless. The whole point of having a committee is to be able to either kill the entire bill, or a congressional appointment before such a bill / confirmation is debated by all 100 senators. Same thing in the House.
If it was possible to bypass committees, then people would have floored the SKIL or other bills directly on the floor of the house, therby bypassing Jim Sensenbrenner and his Judiciary committee last year.
Now to the present situation, Harry Reid, the current majority leader never ever publicly spoke one good word about CIR, the present senate judiciary committee chairman, Patrick J. Leahy has not displayed even 1/100 the urgency nor the interest in CIR that Arlon Specter displayed, president Bush though still supporting CIR is a wounded president licking his wounds and has truly become a lame duck president (most unfortunately for us).
Having considered the above facts what are the chances of CIR happening? Its very painful to say that but I think very low. Even by a miracle (a very big miracle at that) if something happens it will be November or December 2007 before it passes.
As if this not painful enough there is a 60 day waiting period from the day the president signs it before it becomes a law. I think there is some confusion on this 60 day period (I am not 100% sure on this). In addition to it if I remember correctly there was a strange condition which was something like there would be a 6 month investigation period to determine the effects of CIR before becoming a law. If you add all this nonsense up I think in the best case scenario January or February 2008 before CIR becomes law and worst case scenario July or August 2008 to become a law. just my 2 cents. I can only pray and hope I am wrong.
Bills almost never go to the floor directly. Especially something as huge as CIR. It will go thru committee again and it will go thru normal rounds of debate and amendments between the 18 people in Judiciary committee.
Its very unusual for a bill to hit the floor directly without going thru the committee that has jurisdiction over it. If it happens all the time, then the committees would be meaningless. The whole point of having a committee is to be able to either kill the entire bill, or a congressional appointment before such a bill / confirmation is debated by all 100 senators. Same thing in the House.
If it was possible to bypass committees, then people would have floored the SKIL or other bills directly on the floor of the house, therby bypassing Jim Sensenbrenner and his Judiciary committee last year.
more...
bkam
04-14 09:01 AM
Berkeleybee,
Discussing the way the immigrants are treated in this country is a very constructive conversation. Discussing the way of getting out of this situation is also a very constructive conversation.
Although I appreciate your (the core team) efforts and support them, we are still light years away from a quick and effective solution of the backlog and retrogression problems. All - government, Senate, Congress, Immigration service, big business etc do not care at all about the legal immigrants (better not use another popular expression :-). Do you need a prove for that !? And do you know why is that ? - because nobody "votes with the feet" and there is a permanent flow of "dreamers" hoping to get a GC. The big business is interested in guest workers, not in quick resolution of the GC problem - idiots like us cost less, do not dear to demand rights and are quiet and patient people who could bear a lot. And do not forget that the big business pulls the strings of the politicians.
Bottom line - the lack of negative feedback (voting with the feet for example) contributed to the current mess in the Immigration.
You should have access to my email address - call me and I will give you some helpful information.
Discussing the way the immigrants are treated in this country is a very constructive conversation. Discussing the way of getting out of this situation is also a very constructive conversation.
Although I appreciate your (the core team) efforts and support them, we are still light years away from a quick and effective solution of the backlog and retrogression problems. All - government, Senate, Congress, Immigration service, big business etc do not care at all about the legal immigrants (better not use another popular expression :-). Do you need a prove for that !? And do you know why is that ? - because nobody "votes with the feet" and there is a permanent flow of "dreamers" hoping to get a GC. The big business is interested in guest workers, not in quick resolution of the GC problem - idiots like us cost less, do not dear to demand rights and are quiet and patient people who could bear a lot. And do not forget that the big business pulls the strings of the politicians.
Bottom line - the lack of negative feedback (voting with the feet for example) contributed to the current mess in the Immigration.
You should have access to my email address - call me and I will give you some helpful information.
hot celula vegetal e animal.
seekerofpeace
09-18 09:42 AM
GCN007,
Here is what I replied to the congressman's inquiry mail:
Thanks for your help.
But as it is evident from the mail...they are not at all sincere in their reply. If receipt date is the issue then I won't have been approved either and nor would hundreds of my friends and colleagues who have got approved having receipt dates after me. Also our receipt date is July 23rd 2007 as is in the receipt notice from TSC and TSC is currently processing Mid -August. So TSC is not even looking at her case and just sending you a standard reply. This is the same reply that I received on opening a service request at TSC, I had hopes that they would treat inquiry from Congressman's office with more due diligence.
All I need to know is what is holding her approval and if anything we can do to fix. I have got that" to wait 90 day' reply last year also. Let's see what they have to tell about the FP/Biometrics.
Problem is I can't even leave the country without the green card now that I am approved but god knows when I will get that...All my colleagues at work have got their physical cards for their entire family in mail and that's what hurting me about the inconsistency of the way they treat applications.
The Congressman's office were decent enough to reply:
I understand your point. Let�s see what TSC comes back with on my fingerprint question.
I am not sure if I can contact any other congressman, someone like BFrank I guess has more influence but he does not represent my county.
Yesterday, I sent mails to the President and Janet Napolitano....Futile of course...but I feel better that at least I did my part....
SoP
Here is what I replied to the congressman's inquiry mail:
Thanks for your help.
But as it is evident from the mail...they are not at all sincere in their reply. If receipt date is the issue then I won't have been approved either and nor would hundreds of my friends and colleagues who have got approved having receipt dates after me. Also our receipt date is July 23rd 2007 as is in the receipt notice from TSC and TSC is currently processing Mid -August. So TSC is not even looking at her case and just sending you a standard reply. This is the same reply that I received on opening a service request at TSC, I had hopes that they would treat inquiry from Congressman's office with more due diligence.
All I need to know is what is holding her approval and if anything we can do to fix. I have got that" to wait 90 day' reply last year also. Let's see what they have to tell about the FP/Biometrics.
Problem is I can't even leave the country without the green card now that I am approved but god knows when I will get that...All my colleagues at work have got their physical cards for their entire family in mail and that's what hurting me about the inconsistency of the way they treat applications.
The Congressman's office were decent enough to reply:
I understand your point. Let�s see what TSC comes back with on my fingerprint question.
I am not sure if I can contact any other congressman, someone like BFrank I guess has more influence but he does not represent my county.
Yesterday, I sent mails to the President and Janet Napolitano....Futile of course...but I feel better that at least I did my part....
SoP
more...
house goseublog: celula animal
bomber
08-16 06:41 PM
There are some places, where employee is kept out of the loop and is being exploited. USCIS is the only body which can help in this. It should send copies of all the transactions it makes with either attorney or the employer. that way the employer/ attorney doesn't get a chance to exploit the employee.
While we can seek IV's help in this for future, what options do we have NOW if we are caught in this situation? Is there any expert on this out here? Can we use a copy of the FP notice instead of the receipt notice. The FP notice has all the information like Name, Case#, RD, ND etc..
While we can seek IV's help in this for future, what options do we have NOW if we are caught in this situation? Is there any expert on this out here? Can we use a copy of the FP notice instead of the receipt notice. The FP notice has all the information like Name, Case#, RD, ND etc..
tattoo 2011 celula vegetal y celula
abigel
08-07 08:56 PM
You may be right in saying that people should be united, but you cannot and should not FORCE them to be. Censoring threads that you think go against the 'united' theme would be just wrong and would hurt IV more than it would help it.
more...
pictures ESTA ES LA CELULA VEGETAL :)
pappu
04-13 01:46 PM
Update: April 13, 2009
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=24824
The problem that IV member Drifter had with his I485 application has been fixed. IV had contacted USCIS and USCIS said that they will reinstate his case.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=24824
The problem that IV member Drifter had with his I485 application has been fixed. IV had contacted USCIS and USCIS said that they will reinstate his case.
dresses celula animal y sus partes.
eb3retro
04-19 01:54 AM
yes i invoked ac-21 myself.., changed 2 jobs in 2 months..thats what i call it as a smell of freedom..
more...
makeup La célula vegetal tiene una
jthomas
06-18 01:20 AM
now atleast we are used to calling lawmakers. Why don't you meet the lawmakers, contact DOL etc.. make sure you have another job in hand and you can do the transfer paper work. As far as my knoweledge one can have 2 H1B at a time but can only work for one.
Call the lawmaker and ask him you have a question and is it a law of this land. Ask as a doubt not a complain
Call the lawmaker and ask him you have a question and is it a law of this land. Ask as a doubt not a complain
girlfriend celula vegetal y celula animal
GCard_Dream
05-06 07:00 PM
You are exactly right. Both H1 and L1 are dual intent visa so why would one be considered resident while the other one non-resident? I don't see how L1 can fulfil the requirement while H1s can't.
I was wondering how L1 can be allowed instate tuition while H1-B's have to pay out of state according to the Arizona list. What exactly is the fundamental difference between the 2 which results in L1's fulfilling the requirements?
I was wondering how L1 can be allowed instate tuition while H1-B's have to pay out of state according to the Arizona list. What exactly is the fundamental difference between the 2 which results in L1's fulfilling the requirements?
hairstyles Célula vegetal Célula animal;
designserve
12-06 04:58 PM
Live in Chicagoland...:)
anai
10-14 11:09 PM
This is not typical, this guy sounds like a scam, ignore..................This is not a family court.According to Mislim crap,you can marry as many as you wanted, you can divorce some saying talak over the phone.This is not some thing rational, stupid muslim crap, i dont understand why every one is eager to help him.
Such hatred has no place on IV.
Such hatred has no place on IV.
WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
07-12 03:12 PM
wednesday or friday :) :)
ok you win :) :)
ok you win :) :)
No comments:
Post a Comment