gene77
10-19 02:31 PM
If possible, speak to the attorney directly - try not to believe the paralegals unless they have your utmost trust.
Just my 2c.
Just my 2c.
wallpaper Apple Tree
paulcao1978
01-26 02:04 PM
It's almost the end of Jan now. Do we have a fax compaign or sth similar?
pappu
12-26 11:27 AM
OK so I was the original poster that spoke about my friend. Now I will give you some insight into my own case. I have been now in the US since 1991(though my PD is August 2001). Here are some details
Jan 1991 : Arrived in US as 19 yr old after completing Diploma in Engineering from India (10 plus 3).
1991- 1996: Took 5 yrs to complete 4 yrs degree as I was paying my own way. Working full time and studying full time on F1 visa.
1996 -1998 : Completed MBA. This time situation was better because I had financial aid and in state tuition.
1998-1999: Completed internship at an Investment Bank. Had to find another job because I Bank didnt want to do H1. Have been at current job since 1999.
2001: CVompany policy was to wait 2 yrs before applying for GC. So finally filed labor in 2001.
2005 : Labor finally approved from BEC. I 140 filed and approved.
June 2007 : 485 filed (as a 36 yr old)
You are here since a very long time.
If rules can be proposed in CIR for undocumented allowing them to get a greencard if they can prove they are here for minimum X number of years, similar rules can be created for legal documented immigrants (like yourself) too. Its just that the legal immigrant community is not united and does not have enough power yet to raise the voice.
Jan 1991 : Arrived in US as 19 yr old after completing Diploma in Engineering from India (10 plus 3).
1991- 1996: Took 5 yrs to complete 4 yrs degree as I was paying my own way. Working full time and studying full time on F1 visa.
1996 -1998 : Completed MBA. This time situation was better because I had financial aid and in state tuition.
1998-1999: Completed internship at an Investment Bank. Had to find another job because I Bank didnt want to do H1. Have been at current job since 1999.
2001: CVompany policy was to wait 2 yrs before applying for GC. So finally filed labor in 2001.
2005 : Labor finally approved from BEC. I 140 filed and approved.
June 2007 : 485 filed (as a 36 yr old)
You are here since a very long time.
If rules can be proposed in CIR for undocumented allowing them to get a greencard if they can prove they are here for minimum X number of years, similar rules can be created for legal documented immigrants (like yourself) too. Its just that the legal immigrant community is not united and does not have enough power yet to raise the voice.
2011 Christmas tree clip art
desi485
11-07 03:14 PM
Friends,
I have been reading a lot about recent mis-handling of AC21 cases. Majority of them were due to employer revoking an approved I-140 after 180 days of filling the I-485. While I do not know laws fully and my understanding is limited, let me share some thoughts on this.
To me, this seems to be an un-ethical tactic by some employers; AFAIK there is no legal requirement for them to do so.
Moreover, it is a Loose-Loose situation for all the concerned parties.
Here is how:
1. For candidate - additional burden of filling an MTR, risk of loosing EAD & Job and financial burden. :eek:
2. For CIS - Addional burden & wastage of resource not only cancelling 140 and sending notice, but also most likely they will have to reverse the decision when candidate will file MTR. (For that matter, there is no fees to cancel an I-140)
3. For employer - Employer gets nothing in return, if he doesn't want to be happy in a sadistic way. Apart from this, it is almost certain that it will bring bad name to employer among future & current employees if harassment was the only motive.
This whole exercise seems to be useless. :confused:
The AC21 law allows employee to move freely using EAD, why should employers be allowed to harass an employee when it is almost certain that employee has done nothing against the law? Isn't this un-ethical? This useless exercise will help none but the attorneys in terms of additional money filling an MTR.
Can we do some brain-storming and come to some strategy to improve this situation? A letter campaign is already going on. Please share other ideas.
One approach I can think is to meet officials and explain them to automatically disable the employers from doing so...An approved 140 should not be allowed to cancel, once 485 is filed and 180 days passed. This will stop the wastage of resources and help to improve efficiency for CIS. Is there a chance we can convince this??? more on the side of administrative fix???
How about making an official AC21 form (like we've AR11 for address change)? CIS can charge a small fees to file for AC21, it will guarantee candidates that their AC21 application has reached to CIS.
Thoughts?
I have been reading a lot about recent mis-handling of AC21 cases. Majority of them were due to employer revoking an approved I-140 after 180 days of filling the I-485. While I do not know laws fully and my understanding is limited, let me share some thoughts on this.
To me, this seems to be an un-ethical tactic by some employers; AFAIK there is no legal requirement for them to do so.
Moreover, it is a Loose-Loose situation for all the concerned parties.
Here is how:
1. For candidate - additional burden of filling an MTR, risk of loosing EAD & Job and financial burden. :eek:
2. For CIS - Addional burden & wastage of resource not only cancelling 140 and sending notice, but also most likely they will have to reverse the decision when candidate will file MTR. (For that matter, there is no fees to cancel an I-140)
3. For employer - Employer gets nothing in return, if he doesn't want to be happy in a sadistic way. Apart from this, it is almost certain that it will bring bad name to employer among future & current employees if harassment was the only motive.
This whole exercise seems to be useless. :confused:
The AC21 law allows employee to move freely using EAD, why should employers be allowed to harass an employee when it is almost certain that employee has done nothing against the law? Isn't this un-ethical? This useless exercise will help none but the attorneys in terms of additional money filling an MTR.
Can we do some brain-storming and come to some strategy to improve this situation? A letter campaign is already going on. Please share other ideas.
One approach I can think is to meet officials and explain them to automatically disable the employers from doing so...An approved 140 should not be allowed to cancel, once 485 is filed and 180 days passed. This will stop the wastage of resources and help to improve efficiency for CIS. Is there a chance we can convince this??? more on the side of administrative fix???
How about making an official AC21 form (like we've AR11 for address change)? CIS can charge a small fees to file for AC21, it will guarantee candidates that their AC21 application has reached to CIS.
Thoughts?
more...
hebbar77
09-11 11:56 AM
How 'bout when you're swimming?
you must carry that in ur underwear... just in case !
you must carry that in ur underwear... just in case !
nat23
02-22 10:08 AM
Is the text of CIR already published? Is there a link to that?
Its mentioned in the article on Washington Times (the link is given above)
Its mentioned in the article on Washington Times (the link is given above)
more...
pooja_34
05-28 10:27 AM
Not sure why you guys still use the paper filing route rather than e-filing. Then you wouldnt be wondering about check cashing etc etc. I have e-filed for both AP and EAD for the last 3 years. Last time my wife's e-filed EAD came in less than 4 weeks.
Wake up people .... E-filing is better than paper filing !!!
Wake up people .... E-filing is better than paper filing !!!
2010 Trees
chanduv23
06-20 02:16 PM
The Forums are not secure as they are watched by anti immigrant groups. Key communications like this can only be through state chapters as the membership to the state chapters are secure. Please contact a chapter that is nearest to you. If not PM me your phone number and contact info, I can pass it on to my state chapter (IV Tri-state) and have someone contact you with information.
This drive is Key for our issues. We need to work on this and burn the phone lines. We are very close indeed.
You are right. Thanks for the great job in the chapter
This drive is Key for our issues. We need to work on this and burn the phone lines. We are very close indeed.
You are right. Thanks for the great job in the chapter
more...
rajabeta
09-26 12:23 PM
saw my bank a/c online and saw the checks being cashed. also got LUD on 485. when do you guys think I can expect AP?
I have updated my signature as well
I have updated my signature as well
hair Rpg Map Symbols Tree clip art
hsm2007
10-18 10:59 AM
sbind,
Going to Initial Review after approval is scary but normal when you get done FP after approval. I think if you have the I-797 approval then there is nothing to worry about. If you follow a thread in tracki*t you will know that couple of people also got similar status change after FP.
Going to Initial Review after approval is scary but normal when you get done FP after approval. I think if you have the I-797 approval then there is nothing to worry about. If you follow a thread in tracki*t you will know that couple of people also got similar status change after FP.
more...
kutra
03-20 09:00 AM
You still haven't shown me the text from any of the three bills that says Masters in STEM are exempt from the EB cap. After all, that's the only thing that will prove you or me wrong.
Regards,
Jayant
Jayant aka PD_Dec2002:
Can't believe you got suckered into this. "gceb1" is up to no good...spewing his frustration at you and lskreddy. He/she cannot justify his own posts to save his/her own butt.
I count you among the several "voices of reason and logic" in these forums since more-often-than-not you will do the research and provide appropriate links. So just ignore this "gceb1" idiot, and continue what you do. Ideally, everyone should ignore this "gceb1" idiot. :)
Regards,
Jayant
Jayant aka PD_Dec2002:
Can't believe you got suckered into this. "gceb1" is up to no good...spewing his frustration at you and lskreddy. He/she cannot justify his own posts to save his/her own butt.
I count you among the several "voices of reason and logic" in these forums since more-often-than-not you will do the research and provide appropriate links. So just ignore this "gceb1" idiot, and continue what you do. Ideally, everyone should ignore this "gceb1" idiot. :)
hot This quot;windswept treequot; clipart
abhijitp
08-20 01:23 PM
that you will attend the DC rally... I won't tell you if I got the receipt notice;)
(I filed my AOS on July 2 at TSC)
TSC has officially progressed to 6/30 so the July filers should now start receiving their receipt notices! But the question is, what do we do after we get them, or in the worst case, if our AOS got rejected? There is nothing you or I can do at this time... the deadline to re-submit is over on August 17th.
The root cause of the whole problem is retrogression & country caps, and unless we speak up about it in one voice, no one will do anything to fix that root cause!
So keep looking at the road as you drive, but also take a moment to look beyond the next 1 mile... where there is a traffic jam in which you and I will get stuck for the next 5 to 10 years... unless we do something about it.. together!
So, please take a break from tracking receipts, and decide how long you are willing to renew EADs and worry about following the complex AC21 rules & regulations. If you are like me and not willing to do that forever, then make up your mind and attend the DC rally!
If you attend the rally, you can travel to DC for free/ a fraction of the cost, please look at these threads:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12566
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12441
Thanks!
(I filed my AOS on July 2 at TSC)
TSC has officially progressed to 6/30 so the July filers should now start receiving their receipt notices! But the question is, what do we do after we get them, or in the worst case, if our AOS got rejected? There is nothing you or I can do at this time... the deadline to re-submit is over on August 17th.
The root cause of the whole problem is retrogression & country caps, and unless we speak up about it in one voice, no one will do anything to fix that root cause!
So keep looking at the road as you drive, but also take a moment to look beyond the next 1 mile... where there is a traffic jam in which you and I will get stuck for the next 5 to 10 years... unless we do something about it.. together!
So, please take a break from tracking receipts, and decide how long you are willing to renew EADs and worry about following the complex AC21 rules & regulations. If you are like me and not willing to do that forever, then make up your mind and attend the DC rally!
If you attend the rally, you can travel to DC for free/ a fraction of the cost, please look at these threads:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12566
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12441
Thanks!
more...
house tree clipart images. christmas
acecupid
07-02 05:54 PM
Guys, I think we should have some media coverage for the USCIS and DOS actions. Since immigration news has been hot in the media for a while. It will be easy to get channels to cover this story.
Send emails to news channels to cover the story. You can quote the story from AILA
Administration Slams Door on Thousands of Legal Immigrants: AILA Condemns Agencies� Bait and Switch
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 07070264 (posted Jul. 2, 2007)"
CONTACT: George Tzamaras
202-216-2410
gtzamaras@aila.org
WASHINGTON, D.C.--The American Immigration Lawyers Association strongly condemns the bait and switch perpetrated by the federal government on thousands of intending immigrants who have waited in line for years and were following the rules for obtaining a "green card."
On June 13, 2007, the U.S. State Department announced that, as of July 2, individuals seeking permanent residence ("green cards") through employer sponsorship finally would be allowed to proceed with their applications. Applicants would have a short window, possibly only through July or perhaps August, to complete their paperwork.
Those intending immigrants, immediately and at great expense, rushed to gather final documents, complete their paperwork and obtain required medical exams. Many sent their applications off on Friday, June 29 for arrival on July 2 at the Department of Homeland Security, for the last phase of the multi-step process that leads to a green card.
However, on the very day the door was to open, DOS and DHS slammed it shut.
On July 2, DHS and DOS announced-based on no different information than they had on June 13 when they announced the opening of this filing door-that all applications would be turned away.
"People ask why those who come to the United States illegally can't just follow the rules," said Kathleen Campbell Walker, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. "But here people followed the rules and did everything right, yet without warning or explanation the door was slammed in their faces. This hoax perpetrated by these two government agencies is unconscionable, and is an example of how badly our immigration system is broken."
AILA calls on the Administration to do the right thing and keep its promise to the people affected by this sudden reversal. AILA also calls on Congress to get it right this time and fix our badly broken system.
================================================== ========
GENERAL FOX NEWS CHANNEL E-MAIL ADDRESSES:
America's Newsroom � AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com
The Beltway Boys � Beltway@foxnews.com
The Big Story w/ John Gibson � Myword@foxnews.com
The Big Story Weekend � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
The Big Story Primetime � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
Bulls & Bears � Bullsandbears@foxnews.com
Cashin' In � Cash@foxnews.com
Cavuto on Business � Cavuto@foxnews.com
FNC iMag � Fncimag@foxnews.com
Forbes on FOX � Forbes@foxnews.com
FOX & Friends � Friends@foxnews.com
FOX Fan Central � YourComments@foxnews.com
FOX News Live � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Live w/ Jamie Colby � Jamie@foxnews.com
FOX News Live Weekend � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Specials � Fncspecials@foxnews.com
FOX News Sunday � FNS@foxnews.com
FOX News Watch � Newswatch@foxnews.com
FOX Report w/ Shepard Smith � Foxreport@foxnews.com
FOX Report Weekend � Foxreport@foxnews.com
Geraldo at Large � Atlarge@foxnews.com
Hannity & Colmes � Hannity@foxnews.com OR Colmes@foxnews.com
Heartland w/ John Kasich � Heartland@foxnews.com
The Journal Editorial Report � JER@foxnews.com
The Lineup � Lineup@foxnews.com
The Live Desk w/ Martha MacCallum � Martha@foxnews.com
On the Record w/ Greta Van Susteren � Ontherecord@foxnews.com
The O'Reilly Factor � Oreilly@foxnews.com
Red Eye � Redeye@foxnews.com
Special Report w/ Brit Hume � Special@foxnews.com
Studio B w/ Shepard Smith � Studiob@foxnews.com
War Stories w/ Oliver North � Comments@foxnews.com
Your World w/ Neil Cavuto � Cavuto@foxnews.com
WebEditors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com, Customer.Care@newsweek.com, viewerservices@msnbc.com, today@nbc.com, wt@nbc.com, mtp@nbc.com, AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com, Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com, Feedback@foxnews.com, Newswatch@foxnews.com
Send emails to news channels to cover the story. You can quote the story from AILA
Administration Slams Door on Thousands of Legal Immigrants: AILA Condemns Agencies� Bait and Switch
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 07070264 (posted Jul. 2, 2007)"
CONTACT: George Tzamaras
202-216-2410
gtzamaras@aila.org
WASHINGTON, D.C.--The American Immigration Lawyers Association strongly condemns the bait and switch perpetrated by the federal government on thousands of intending immigrants who have waited in line for years and were following the rules for obtaining a "green card."
On June 13, 2007, the U.S. State Department announced that, as of July 2, individuals seeking permanent residence ("green cards") through employer sponsorship finally would be allowed to proceed with their applications. Applicants would have a short window, possibly only through July or perhaps August, to complete their paperwork.
Those intending immigrants, immediately and at great expense, rushed to gather final documents, complete their paperwork and obtain required medical exams. Many sent their applications off on Friday, June 29 for arrival on July 2 at the Department of Homeland Security, for the last phase of the multi-step process that leads to a green card.
However, on the very day the door was to open, DOS and DHS slammed it shut.
On July 2, DHS and DOS announced-based on no different information than they had on June 13 when they announced the opening of this filing door-that all applications would be turned away.
"People ask why those who come to the United States illegally can't just follow the rules," said Kathleen Campbell Walker, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. "But here people followed the rules and did everything right, yet without warning or explanation the door was slammed in their faces. This hoax perpetrated by these two government agencies is unconscionable, and is an example of how badly our immigration system is broken."
AILA calls on the Administration to do the right thing and keep its promise to the people affected by this sudden reversal. AILA also calls on Congress to get it right this time and fix our badly broken system.
================================================== ========
GENERAL FOX NEWS CHANNEL E-MAIL ADDRESSES:
America's Newsroom � AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com
The Beltway Boys � Beltway@foxnews.com
The Big Story w/ John Gibson � Myword@foxnews.com
The Big Story Weekend � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
The Big Story Primetime � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
Bulls & Bears � Bullsandbears@foxnews.com
Cashin' In � Cash@foxnews.com
Cavuto on Business � Cavuto@foxnews.com
FNC iMag � Fncimag@foxnews.com
Forbes on FOX � Forbes@foxnews.com
FOX & Friends � Friends@foxnews.com
FOX Fan Central � YourComments@foxnews.com
FOX News Live � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Live w/ Jamie Colby � Jamie@foxnews.com
FOX News Live Weekend � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Specials � Fncspecials@foxnews.com
FOX News Sunday � FNS@foxnews.com
FOX News Watch � Newswatch@foxnews.com
FOX Report w/ Shepard Smith � Foxreport@foxnews.com
FOX Report Weekend � Foxreport@foxnews.com
Geraldo at Large � Atlarge@foxnews.com
Hannity & Colmes � Hannity@foxnews.com OR Colmes@foxnews.com
Heartland w/ John Kasich � Heartland@foxnews.com
The Journal Editorial Report � JER@foxnews.com
The Lineup � Lineup@foxnews.com
The Live Desk w/ Martha MacCallum � Martha@foxnews.com
On the Record w/ Greta Van Susteren � Ontherecord@foxnews.com
The O'Reilly Factor � Oreilly@foxnews.com
Red Eye � Redeye@foxnews.com
Special Report w/ Brit Hume � Special@foxnews.com
Studio B w/ Shepard Smith � Studiob@foxnews.com
War Stories w/ Oliver North � Comments@foxnews.com
Your World w/ Neil Cavuto � Cavuto@foxnews.com
WebEditors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com, Customer.Care@newsweek.com, viewerservices@msnbc.com, today@nbc.com, wt@nbc.com, mtp@nbc.com, AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com, Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com, Feedback@foxnews.com, Newswatch@foxnews.com
tattoo tree clipart images. clip art
sundar99
02-27 01:35 AM
http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20060306&fname=Mittal&sid=2
Check this out ! ! !
Check this out ! ! !
more...
pictures tree clipart images. tree clip
GreeNever
02-27 08:54 AM
Good point, Iptel. Afterall, the atmosphere/mood during President Bush's is "tight on negotiations" one.
Simple, this way..what is the take of the office of Quinn Gillespie on this issue? They are our counsel.
BTW, good to see there is some thought spent in this direction, even if the thought seemingly died down earlier (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=134).
Simple, this way..what is the take of the office of Quinn Gillespie on this issue? They are our counsel.
BTW, good to see there is some thought spent in this direction, even if the thought seemingly died down earlier (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=134).
dresses christmas tree clipart.
lazycis
02-29 01:51 PM
if you have EAD and 140 is approved (And 180 passed since 485filed), then why are you worried about H1 status ?
am I missing something here ..I let my H1 expire and am using EAD now.
I had another question - if one has EAD and 140 is approved (and 180 days passed and a person does not hav H1) - then how long can that person stay unemployed ? please reply if you know ..Thanks !!
GC is fo future employment so technically you need to have an employment offer when your GC is ready for approval. You can be unemployed up to that date, there is no requirement for continuos employment.
am I missing something here ..I let my H1 expire and am using EAD now.
I had another question - if one has EAD and 140 is approved (and 180 days passed and a person does not hav H1) - then how long can that person stay unemployed ? please reply if you know ..Thanks !!
GC is fo future employment so technically you need to have an employment offer when your GC is ready for approval. You can be unemployed up to that date, there is no requirement for continuos employment.
more...
makeup christmas tree clip art.gif,
kavita
08-07 08:52 PM
I agree with above posts.
I am EB2 with PD Nov 07, so I have a lot of wait to do. But I feel bad when I see people trying to stop EB3 to EB2 porting.
Where is the compassion? I believe we should concentrate fighting with outside forces rather within the group.
I am EB2 with PD Nov 07, so I have a lot of wait to do. But I feel bad when I see people trying to stop EB3 to EB2 porting.
Where is the compassion? I believe we should concentrate fighting with outside forces rather within the group.
girlfriend tree-clipart-2-1.jpg
omahaguy
04-06 11:22 AM
Thank you all four replies. You guys are relly helpful. I did not change state, I just moved from one street to another street with in the same city.
But only thing is I am working for different employer and I have NOT yet applied AC21. If this RFE is about "employment verification", I am thinking of sending from new employer since my I 485 filed more than 6 months. I hope this is ok. Please correct me if I am wrong.
But only thing is I am working for different employer and I have NOT yet applied AC21. If this RFE is about "employment verification", I am thinking of sending from new employer since my I 485 filed more than 6 months. I hope this is ok. Please correct me if I am wrong.
hairstyles Liberty Tree
kufloyd
06-14 11:34 AM
Hi Kunal,
I am in the same boat. In my online status it showed exactly same msg. Then after couple of days it started showing the following msg:
Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: This case has been sent to our local office for processing.
On May 19, 2008, we transferred this case to our DES MOINES, IA location for additional processing. You will be notified by mail when a decision is made, or if the office needs something from you. If you move while this case is pending, call customer service. We process cases in the order we receive them. You can use our processing dates to estimate when this case will be done. This case has been sent to our DES MOINES, IA location. Follow the link below to check processing dates. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.
Please note: All this status changes and Soft LUD's are only for primary applicant and not for spouse's application. we have no connection with DES MOINES, IA, never stayed there , never worked there nor our company is from there. Don't know why it got transfered to local office there.
I am hoping that this all means that my case is assigned to officer.
Guru's any idea what all this means?
Just saw a soft LUD today. No status change from yesterday though.
fundo14 - how long has it been since it was transfered to the Des Moines office? Have you called and spoken to an IO about this change?
I am in the same boat. In my online status it showed exactly same msg. Then after couple of days it started showing the following msg:
Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: This case has been sent to our local office for processing.
On May 19, 2008, we transferred this case to our DES MOINES, IA location for additional processing. You will be notified by mail when a decision is made, or if the office needs something from you. If you move while this case is pending, call customer service. We process cases in the order we receive them. You can use our processing dates to estimate when this case will be done. This case has been sent to our DES MOINES, IA location. Follow the link below to check processing dates. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.
Please note: All this status changes and Soft LUD's are only for primary applicant and not for spouse's application. we have no connection with DES MOINES, IA, never stayed there , never worked there nor our company is from there. Don't know why it got transfered to local office there.
I am hoping that this all means that my case is assigned to officer.
Guru's any idea what all this means?
Just saw a soft LUD today. No status change from yesterday though.
fundo14 - how long has it been since it was transfered to the Des Moines office? Have you called and spoken to an IO about this change?
ashkam
01-24 04:39 PM
Agree with genscn. Actually, if your wife is not working on-campus, then she doesn't even have to show her EAD. Just send your I-485 receipt copy which proves that she is here under AOS status in which case she can study anywhere she wants and take as many credit hours she wants without being out of status.
Just let the school know that your wife doesn't need to be in F1 status anymore. Let them report whatever they want to the INS.
Just let the school know that your wife doesn't need to be in F1 status anymore. Let them report whatever they want to the INS.
anilsal
11-30 01:27 PM
The issue is that my company lawyer said that there will be a need for a visa stamping done for the extension because of the Last action rule. The murthy forum reference is something I dug up via google.
Because the extension will be for a future date (March 1). Current visa stamp is till Feb 28, 2007. So if the officer gives a new I-94 with Feb 28, 2007 as the validity date, the attorneys claim that it will invalidate the approved extension due to a "Last Action Rule".
It is hard to trust these corporate lawyers.
Because the extension will be for a future date (March 1). Current visa stamp is till Feb 28, 2007. So if the officer gives a new I-94 with Feb 28, 2007 as the validity date, the attorneys claim that it will invalidate the approved extension due to a "Last Action Rule".
It is hard to trust these corporate lawyers.
No comments:
Post a Comment